Re: Slowness of extended protocol - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Slowness of extended protocol
Date
Msg-id 20160803233515.GB1702@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slowness of extended protocol  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Slowness of extended protocol  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug  3, 2016 at 10:02:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 05:57:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> In hindsight it seems clear that what a lot of apps want out of extended
> >> protocol is only the ability to send parameter values out-of-line instead
> >> of having to quote/escape them into SQL literals.  Maybe an idea for the
> >> fabled V4 protocol update is some compromise query type that corresponds
> >> precisely to PQexecParams's feature set: you can send parameter values
> >> out-of-line, and you can specify text or binary results, but there's no
> >> notion of any persistent state being created and no feedback about
> >> parameter data types.
> 
> > Do you want this on the TODO list?
> 
> I didn't hear anyone say it was a silly idea, so sure.

Done:
Create a more efficient way to handle out-of-line parameters 

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: regression test for extended query protocol