Re: pg_rewind confusion - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_rewind confusion
Date
Msg-id 20160721171509.GA6394@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_rewind confusion  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_rewind confusion
List pgsql-docs
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:11:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > I was confused by pg_rewind's ability to use a remote source server, and
> > another core team member was confused as well, so I figured I should
> > update the pg_rewind docs to be clearer.
> >
> > Attached is a patch to do that.
>
> This is a clean set of improvements.
>
> -   <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"> must also be enabled.  That is the
> -   default.
> +   <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"> must also be on, but it is
> +   enabled by default.
> Perhaps you should add a <literal> markup around "on"? And say "must
> be also set to on"

Well, "must also be on" isn't using "on" as a literal, but "must be also
set to on" does use it as a literal, and I changed the text to that.

> -        with superuser access. This option requires the server to be running
> -        and not in recovery mode.
> +        with superuser access. This option requires the local or remote
> +        server to be running and not in recovery mode.
> I don't think that "local or remote" is an improvement here. You could
> just say "source".

I was trying to highlight that the source can be remote with
--source-server.  I have change it to what you suggested.  Is it stil
clear?

> +      Copy all other files such as <filename>clog</filename> and
> clog is not a term used a lot in the docs. It may be better to refer
> to pg_clog, or transaction status data.

Agreed, changed to "pg_clog".

Updated patch attached.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind confusion
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind confusion