On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 03:28:23PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-04-16 18:23:01 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:00:57AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > > I can think of a number of relatively easy ways to address this:
> > > > 1) Just zap (or issue?) all pending flush requests when getting an
> > > > smgrinval/smgrclosenode
> > > > 2) Do 1), but filter for the closed relnode
> > > > 3) Actually handle the case of the last open segment not being
> > > > RELSEG_SIZE properly in _mdfd_getseg() - mdnblocks() does so.
> > > >
> > > > I'm kind of inclined to do both 3) and 1).
> >
> > Andres, you own the underlying open item, right?
>
> Right.
>
> > Do you plan to implement this fix you have outlined? If so, when?
>
> Yes, I plan to next week.
Completion by the end of next week will work. Thanks. At that time
(2016-04-24T00:00 UTC), this would otherwise have spent twenty-three days as
an open item. Would you inform this thread if you discover reasons to think
your plan will no longer succeed?
