On 2016-04-16 18:23:01 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:00:57AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > I can think of a number of relatively easy ways to address this:
> > > 1) Just zap (or issue?) all pending flush requests when getting an
> > > smgrinval/smgrclosenode
> > > 2) Do 1), but filter for the closed relnode
> > > 3) Actually handle the case of the last open segment not being
> > > RELSEG_SIZE properly in _mdfd_getseg() - mdnblocks() does so.
> > >
> > > I'm kind of inclined to do both 3) and 1).
>
> Andres, you own the underlying open item, right?
Right.
> Do you plan to implement this fix you have outlined? If so, when?
Yes, I plan to next week.
- Andres
