Re: BUG #13702: pg_dump interprets “=”in a db name incorrectly - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David Gould
Subject Re: BUG #13702: pg_dump interprets “=”in a db name incorrectly
Date
Msg-id 20151023054510.5b5467c6@engels
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #13702: pg_dump interprets “=” in a db name incorrectly  (Felipe Gasper <felipe@felipegasper.com>)
Responses pg_restore WAS Re: BUG #13702: pg_dump interprets “=” in a db name incorrectly
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:30:20 -0500
Felipe Gasper <felipe@felipegasper.com> wrote:

> Interesting -- also, in 9.0 I *can* do:
>
> dbname='...'
>
> … and it works. Undocumented, apparently (?), but it does the job.
>
> But, I actually have to support all the way back to 8.1, and I’m a bit
> leery of relying on undocumented (?) features for our backup
> functionality. Hopefully down the road we can just move everything to
>  >=9.3, and peace and love will reign. :)

You can dump and load older version database from newer version clients.
The dbname parsing problem you are having is on the client, not the server,
so if you can arrange to take the backup with a more current client then
one of the suggestions in this thread will work for you.

-dg

--
David Gould                                   daveg@sonic.net
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Felipe Gasper
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13702: pg_dump interprets “=” in a db name incorrectly
Next
From: Sergey Burladyan
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13657: Some kind of undetected deadlock between query and "startup process" on replica.