On 2015-09-09 18:27:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sure, it’s a clear fact that, we can implement this function with RAISE
> > statements.
>
> Given that, I suggest we just forget the whole thing.
I'm not convinced. Sure, it's easy, but I by now have written the
respective function dozens of times. Why should we force that on
everyone?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
