Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message
Date
Msg-id 20150910004719.GA19524@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:32:10AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-09-09 18:27:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sure, it’s a clear fact that, we can implement this function
> > > with RAISE statements.
> > 
> > Given that, I suggest we just forget the whole thing.
> 
> I'm not convinced. Sure, it's easy, but I by now have written the
> respective function dozens of times. Why should we force that on
> everyone?

+20 or so here, that being the number of times I recall offhand having
written the function.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do Layered Views/Relations Preserve Sort Order ?
Next
From: Charles Sheridan
Date:
Subject: Re: Do Layered Views/Relations Preserve Sort Order ?