On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:32:10AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-09-09 18:27:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sure, it’s a clear fact that, we can implement this function > > > with RAISE statements. > > > > Given that, I suggest we just forget the whole thing. > > I'm not convinced. Sure, it's easy, but I by now have written the > respective function dozens of times. Why should we force that on > everyone?
+20 or so here, that being the number of times I recall offhand having written the function.
I have same opinion - it is pretty often used function.
