Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release
Date
Msg-id 20150529222800.GG16602@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:37:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Do we need release notes for an alpha?  Once I do the release notes, it
> > is possible to miss subtle changes in the code that aren't mentioned in
> > commit messages.
> 
> If the commit message isn't clear about something, you'd likely miss the
> issue anyway, no?  Anyway, once the release notes are in the tree, we

I often do research in the git tree to get details on the feature beyond
just looking at the commit or the patch.

> could expect that anyone committing a user-visible semantics change should
> update the release notes themselves.

Yes, that would be nice.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1