On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:44:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > On 05/23/2015 11:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, pgindent has *always* been wonky about lines that contain a typedef
> >> name but are not variable declarations.
>
> > Well, that sounds like something we should try to patch, doesn't it?
> > (No, I'm not volunteering.)
>
> In the past, the main argument against changing pgindent has been that
> it would cause reformatting of settled code. For example, when Bruce
> twiddled its right margin limit for comments around 8.1, that caused
> literally years worth of back-patching pain. If we can get to an
> agreement on re-indenting back branches at the same time as master,
> then this problem would go away, and I for one would get a lot more
> enthusiastic about trying to improve pgindent rather than just working
> around its oddities.
>
> Not that I'm volunteering either right now.
That is something we will need to fix in the BSD indent code.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
