I sure wish this had arrived two minutes earlier ...
Robert Haas wrote:
> Putting the period inside the parentheses here looks weird?
>
> + "This command would create a
> multixact with %u members, which exceeds remaining space (%u
> members.)",
>
> Maybe rephrase as: "This command would create a multixact with %u
> members, but the remaining space is only enough for %u members."
WFM, will change.
> I don't think this should have a comma:
>
> + errhint("Execute a database-wide VACUUM in that
> database, with reduced vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age and
> vacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age settings.")));
Ditto.
> This looks like excess brace-ifiaction:
>
> + if (start < boundary)
> + {
> + return finish >= boundary || finish < start;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + return finish >= boundary && finish < start;
> + }
Yeah, agreed. Will undo that change. (I disliked the comment above the
indented single-statement, so added braces, but then moved the comment.
I should have removed the braces at that point.)
> I think this is confusing:
>
> +/*
> + * Read the offset of the first member of the given multixact.
> + */
>
> This is confusing to me because the two subdirectories of pg_multixact
> are called "members" and "offsets". Here you are talking about the
> offset of the first member. Maybe I'm just slow, but that seems like
> conflating terminology. You end up with a function called
> read_offset_for_multi() that is actually looking up information about
> members. Ick.
Yeah, I introduced the confusing terminology while inventing multixacts
initially and have regretted it many times. I will think about a better
name for this. (Meanwhile, on IM Robert suggested
find_start_of_first_multi_member)
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
