> Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney@gmail.com> writes:
> > Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits the GROUP
> > BY as implicitly grouping by all the columns that aren't part of an aggregate?
I'm Mr. Curious today ...
Why would you think that such a thing is necessary or desirable? Simply add the
columns to the GROUP BY clause and make the request unambiguous.
--
Bill Moran