On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:01:39AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > The
> > Windows-specif code we do carry is required and was developed by people
> > that are no longer as involved.
> >
>
> I have seen many a times that once committer's (those who are not generally
> involved in Windows development) get reasonable confidence about patch
> and the review done for the same, they commit the patch. It happens both
> for the patches where I was Author and where I was Reviewer, although I
> agree that it takes more time.
Here is Windows change to properly detach the server process that never
got implemented as no Windows expert developed or tested a patch, but
test code was posted:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/53759381.4000205@cubiclesoft.com#53759381.4000205@cubiclesoft.com
Here is another unapplied Windows patch for preventing Control-C from
closing the server:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20140410214426.GI6917@momjian.us#20140410214426.GI6917@momjian.us
Again, I would love to say we handle Windows patches well, but we don't.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
