On 2015-01-22 11:24:31 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:01:39AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > The
> > > Windows-specif code we do carry is required and was developed by people
> > > that are no longer as involved.
> > >
> >
> > I have seen many a times that once committer's (those who are not generally
> > involved in Windows development) get reasonable confidence about patch
> > and the review done for the same, they commit the patch. It happens both
> > for the patches where I was Author and where I was Reviewer, although I
> > agree that it takes more time.
>
> Here is Windows change to properly detach the server process that never
> got implemented as no Windows expert developed or tested a patch, but
> test code was posted:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/53759381.4000205@cubiclesoft.com#53759381.4000205@cubiclesoft.com
>
> Here is another unapplied Windows patch for preventing Control-C from
> closing the server:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20140410214426.GI6917@momjian.us#20140410214426.GI6917@momjian.us
>
> Again, I would love to say we handle Windows patches well, but we don't.
I unfortunately don't the issue is that specific to windows.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
