On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:47:29PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/11/14 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have heard repeated concerns about the commitfest process in the past
> > few months. The fact we have been in a continual commitfest since
> > August also is concerning.
>
> I realized the other day, I'm embracing the idea of a continual commitfest.
>
> I'm still working on patches from the last commitfest. Why not? They
> didn't expire. Sure, it would have been nicer to get them done sooner,
> but what are you gonna do? The fact that Nov 15 < now < Dec 15 isn't
> going to change the fact that I have a few hours to spare right now and
> the patches are still relevant.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, we might as well just have one commitfest per
> major release. Call it a patch list. Make the list sortable by created
> date and last-updated date, and let the system police itself. At least
> that's honest.
Wow, that's radical, and interesting.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
