Re: Commitfest problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Commitfest problems
Date
Msg-id 548A08BE.5050407@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest problems  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Commitfest problems  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/11/2014 01:07 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:47:29PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 12/11/14 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I have heard repeated concerns about the commitfest process in
>>> the past few months.  The fact we have been in a continual
>>> commitfest since August also is concerning.
>> 
>> I realized the other day, I'm embracing the idea of a continual
>> commitfest.
>> 
>> I'm still working on patches from the last commitfest.  Why not?
>> They didn't expire.  Sure, it would have been nicer to get them
>> done sooner, but what are you gonna do?  The fact that Nov 15 <
>> now < Dec 15 isn't going to change the fact that I have a few
>> hours to spare right now and the patches are still relevant.
>> 
>> As far as I'm concerned, we might as well just have one
>> commitfest per major release.  Call it a patch list.  Make the
>> list sortable by created date and last-updated date, and let the
>> system police itself.  At least that's honest.
> 
> Wow, that's radical, and interesting.

Actually, to me it sounds a lot like what we did 10 years ago before
the commitfests except with a way to track the patches (other than the
mail archives) and more people participating in patch reviews.

Joe


- -- 
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=hSWH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest problems
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching