On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 03:11:44PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is this correct? Do we have proper super-user restrictions on all the
> right fields now?
>
>
> I'm not sure what the security problem would be for allowing non-superusers to
> run pg_is_xlog_replay_paused(). And if there are none, there is no reason why
> the function should be restricted like that.
>
> Also, looking at that specific documentation page, ISTM it needs a better way
> to show which functions actually *do* require superuser privileges. In some
> groups it states which do require it, and in some where it doesn't. Perhaps we
> should add a column to each of the tables with a yes/no value indicating if
> superuser is required for that specific function? Or at least have every table
> be prefixed by a statement saying which require superuser.
Well, right now we seem to have an inconsistent setup that is being
complained about regularly. Who can review it all and make a
recommendation? Should we just hold all this for 9.5?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
