Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date
Msg-id 20140215194954.GA24455@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-02-15 14:35:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Patch attached.
> 
> Committed with some cosmetic adjustments --- thanks!
> 
> > I am not sure whether HAVE_GETOPT is the best condition
> > to use, since it's set by configure by a link based check, same goes for
> > HAVE_INT_OPTERR. The other choices would be relying on HAVE_GETOPT_H or
> > a new AC_CHECK_DECL.
> 
> I'm pretty sure HAVE_GETOPT is *not* what we want to use for the variable
> declarations.  I've tried HAVE_GETOPT_H for the moment, but that may need
> more tweaking depending on what the buildfarm has to say.

I only used it because it was what previously protected the getopt()
declaration in port.h... But that should probably have been depending on
!HAVE_GETOPT_H in the first place.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: HBA files w/include support?