Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Chinner
Subject Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance
Date
Msg-id 20140119235141.GY3431@dastard
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance  (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>)
Responses Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance  (Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>)
Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance  (Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>)
Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 03:37:37AM +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
> > it's very common to create temporary file data that will never, ever, ever
> > actually NEED to hit disk. Where I work being able to tell the kernel to
> > avoid flushing those files unless the kernel thinks it's got better things
> > to do with that memory would be EXTREMELY valuable
> 
> Windows has the FILE_ATTRIBUTE_TEMPORARY flag for this purpose.
> 
> ISTR that there was discussion about implementing something analogous
> in Linux when ext4 got delayed allocation support, but I don't think
> it got anywhere and I can't find the discussion now. I think the
> proposed interface was to create and then unlink the file immediately,
> which serves as a hint that the application doesn't care about
> persistence.

You're thinking about O_TMPFILE, which is for making temp files that
can't be seen in the filesystem namespace, not for preventing them
from being written to disk.

I don't really like the idea of overloading a namespace directive to
have special writeback connotations. What we are getting into the
realm of here is generic user controlled allocation and writeback
policy...

> Postgres is far from being the only application that wants this; many
> people resort to tmpfs because of this:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/499410/

Yes, we covered the possibility of using tmpfs much earlier in the
thread, and came to the conclusion that temp files can be larger
than memory so tmpfs isn't the solution here. :)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: Compiling extensions on Windows
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)