Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date
Msg-id 20131122215824.GI17400@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-11-22 13:34:18 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I changed my postgres database to default to read only (which is
> not insane, given that I've seen so many people accidentally run
> DDL there rather than in the database they intended)

FWIW, I am less than convinced that it is correct for pg_dump[all] to
emit SET default_transaction_readonly = off; The user might explicitly
have set that to prevent against somebody restoring into the wrong
database or somesuch. Why is it our business to override such decisions?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is UPDATE with column-list syntax not implemented