Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date
Msg-id 1385157310.96336.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:

This covers pg_dumpall globals.  Tested with a read-only postgres
database and with default_transaction_read_only = on in the
postgresql.conf file.

It does nothing about pg_upgrade, which is sort of a separate
issue.  My inclination is that connections to the new cluster
should set this and connections to the old should not.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency