Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun
Date
Msg-id 20131022205317.GB9370@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-10-22 16:38:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2013-10-22 15:24:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, that's hardly a good idea.  As Heikki says, that would amount to
> >> converting an entirely foreseeable situation into a PANIC.
> 
> > But IIUC this can currently lead to an index giving wrong answers, not
> > "just" fail at further inserts?
> 
> No.  It's exactly the same situation as when the insert is still in
> progress, ie searches have to move right when following the original
> downlink.  Go read the nbtree README.

If the parent insert is still in progress we have a write lock on the
left and right page preventing such issues, right? At least that's what
the nbtree README says...
That doesn't hold true if we split a page but fail before re-inserting
the parent since the transaction rollback will obviously have released
the locks.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest II CLosed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reasons not to like asprintf