* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> there's a fairly generous but fixed-at-startup-time limit on how many
> segments you can have. In practice I don't think this matters much,
> but it was a sobering reminder that the main shared memory segment,
> with all of its inflexibility, has important reliability properties
> that are hard to replicate in more dynamic scenarios.
Why wouldn't it be possible to have the same arrangment for
shared_buffers, where you have more entires than you 'need' at startup
but which then allows you to add more shared segments later? I do see
that we would need an additional bit of indirection to handle that,
which might be too much overhead, but the concept seems possible. Isn't
that more-or-less how the kernel handles dynamic memory..?
> Under the currently-proposed design, it can't be used to do any such
> thing. It can only be used to modify some auto.conf file which lives
> in $PGDATA. It's therefore no different from the ops perspective than
> ALTER DATABASE or ALTER USER - except that it allows all settings to
> be changed rather than only a subset.
Claiming that modifying a file *included from a file in /etc* doesn't
modify things under /etc is disingenuous, imv.
Thanks,
Stephen
