Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow
Date
Msg-id 20130805161737.GA11189@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug  5, 2013 at 05:22:28PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-08-05 11:17:08 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > One interesting aspect of this patch is that the backend code is no
> > longer even checking HEAP_MOVED_OFF and HEAP_MOVED_IN.  However, we
> > can't reuse those bits because they could be set from pre-9.0 rows.
> 
> The other tqual.c .satisfies routines still check it - and have to do
> so.
> 
> It'd be nice to get rid of that, but this patch doesn't seem to get us
> nearer towards it :(

Oh, sorry, thanks for pointing that out --- somehow I missed it.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])