Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
Date
Msg-id 20130123171516.GD7048@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-01-23 11:58:28 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> On 01/23/2013 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
> 
> This error message change looks rather odd, and has my head spinning a bit:
> 
> -                    errmsg("SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE cannot be applied to
> the nullable side of an outer join")));
> +                    errmsg("SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE/KEY UPDATE/KEY SHARE
> cannot be applied to the nullable side of an outer join")))
> 
> Can't we do better than that?

I don't really see how? I don't think listing only the current locklevel
really is an improvement and something like "SELECT ... FOR $locktype
cannot .." seem uncommon enough in pg error messages to be strange.
Now I aggree that listing all those locklevels isn't that nice, but I
don't really have a better idea.

Andres

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)