On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:01:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICT, the remote_write setting for synchronous_commit is named exactly
> backwards, because the point of the setting is that it *doesn't* wait
> for the remote to write anything.
>
> As an alternative I suggest "remote_receive". Perhaps somebody else
> has a better idea?
Yes, I didn't like remote_write either; see this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-05/msg00375.php
Yes, please, I would like it changed.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
