Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Isn't remote_write a really dumb name for that setting? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Isn't remote_write a really dumb name for that setting?
Date
Msg-id 17704.1345654864@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Isn't remote_write a really dumb name for that setting?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
AFAICT, the remote_write setting for synchronous_commit is named exactly
backwards, because the point of the setting is that it *doesn't* wait
for the remote to write anything.

As an alternative I suggest "remote_receive".  Perhaps somebody else
has a better idea?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mathieu Fenniak
Date:
Subject: Re: restartpoints stop generating on streaming replication slave
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT NULL constraints in foreign tables