Re: Pg default's verbosity? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Date
Msg-id 20120629070703.GA13903@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pg default's verbosity?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Pg default's verbosity?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:15:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
> > we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though.  IME, the following two
> > messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
> 
> > NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for
> > serial column "foo.a"
> > NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
> > "foo_pkey" for table "foo"
> 
> Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
> both of those two specific messages.  I seem to recall that Bruce has
> lobbied for them heavily in the past, though.

I would like to see them gone or reduced as well.  I think I wanted them
when we changed the fact that SERIAL doesn't create unique indexes, but
that was long ago --- I think everyone knows what happens now.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade log files
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments