Re: Pg default's verbosity? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Date
Msg-id 4771.1340086543@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pg default's verbosity?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Re: Pg default's verbosity?
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
> we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though.  IME, the following two
> messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:

> NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for
> serial column "foo.a"
> NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
> "foo_pkey" for table "foo"

Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
both of those two specific messages.  I seem to recall that Bruce has
lobbied for them heavily in the past, though.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment