Re: spinlocks on HP-UX - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Tatsuo Ishii |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: spinlocks on HP-UX |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 20111228.210344.2067578588617654319.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: spinlocks on HP-UX (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Responses |
Re: spinlocks on HP-UX
(Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
|
| List | pgsql-hackers |
>> With help from IBM Japan Ltd. we did some tests on a larger IBM >> machine than Tom Lane has used for his >> test(http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/8292.1314641721@sss.pgh.pa.us). >> In his case it was IBM 8406-71Y, which has 8 physical cores and >> 4SMT(32 threadings). Ours is IBM Power 750 Express, which has 32 >> physical cores and 4SMT(128 threadings), 256GB RAM. >> >> The test method was same as the one in the article above. The >> differences are OS(RHEL 6.1), gcc version (4.4.5) and shared buffer >> size(8GB). >> >> We tested 3 methods to enhance spin lock contention: >> >> 1) Add "hint" parameter to lwarx op which is usable POWER6 or later >> architecure. >> >> 2) Add non-locked test in TAS() >> >> 3) #1 + #2 >> >> We saw small performance enhancement with #1, larger one with #2 and >> even better with #1+#2. > > Hmm, so you added the non-locked test in TAS()? Did you try adding it > just to TAS_SPIN()? On Itanium, I found that it was slightly better > to do it only in TAS_SPIN() - i.e. in the contended case. Here is new patch using TAS_SPIN(), created by Manabu Ori from IBM Japan. Also this patch deal with older Power architectures which do not have "hint" argument of lwarx opcode. According to him, the patch resulted in much better performance stock git head. Stock git head without patch: pgbench -c 1 -j 1 -S -T 300 tps = 11360.472691 (including ... pgbench -c 2 -j 1 -S -T 300 tps = 22173.943133 (including ... pgbench -c 4 -j 2 -S -T 300 tps = 43397.331641 (including ... pgbench -c 8 -j 4 -S -T 300 tps = 73469.073714 (including ... pgbench -c 16 -j 8 -S -T 300 tps = 151094.270443 (including ... pgbench -c 32 -j 16 -S -T 300 tps = 166752.637452 (including ... pgbench -c 64 -j 32 -S -T 300 tps = 148139.338204 (including ... pgbench -c 128 -j 64 -S -T 300 tps = 115412.622895 (including ... Stock git head with patch: pgbench -c 1 -j 1 -S -T 300 tps = 11103.370854 (including ... pgbench -c 2 -j 1 -S -T 300 tps = 22118.907582 (including ... pgbench -c 4 -j 2 -S -T 300 tps = 42608.641820 (including ... pgbench -c 8 -j 4 -S -T 300 tps = 77592.862639 (including ... pgbench -c 16 -j 8 -S -T 300 tps = 150469.841892 (including ... pgbench -c 32 -j 16 -S -T 300 tps = 267726.082168 (including ... pgbench -c 64 -j 32 -S -T 300 tps = 322582.271713 (including ... pgbench -c 128 -j 64 -S -T 300 tps = 273071.683663 (including ... (Graph is attached) Test environment: Power 750 (32 physical cores, virtually 128 cores using SMT4) mem: 256GB OS: RHEL6.1 kernel 2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.ppc64 gcc version 4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6) PostgreSQL Git head (0510b62d91151b9d8c1fe1aa15c9cf3ffe9bf25b) -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
pgsql-hackers by date: