Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It's not just the port, it's all the connection parameters ---
> >> do_connect relies on the PGconn object to remember those, and in this
> >> case there no longer is a PGconn object.
> >>
> >> We could have psql keep that information separately, but I'm not sure
> >> it's really worth the trouble.
>
> > well, I think it's definitely worth the trouble.
>
> [ shrug.. ] So submit a patch. Personally I don't think the case comes
> up often enough to be worth the trouble, and I'd much rather spend
> development time on preventing the server from crashing in the first
> place.
Should we document this somewhere?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
