Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Date
Msg-id 7375.1315323343@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail  (hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>)
Responses Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail  (hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>)
Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's not just the port, it's all the connection parameters ---
>> do_connect relies on the PGconn object to remember those, and in this
>> case there no longer is a PGconn object.
>>
>> We could have psql keep that information separately, but I'm not sure
>> it's really worth the trouble.

> well, I think it's definitely worth the trouble.

[ shrug.. ]  So submit a patch.  Personally I don't think the case comes
up often enough to be worth the trouble, and I'd much rather spend
development time on preventing the server from crashing in the first
place.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Date:
Subject: Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Next
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Date:
Subject: Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail