On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:24:53 am Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > So far:
> >
> > http://www.cio.com.au/article/384968/open_source_postgresql_9_1_beta_rele
> > ased/
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/440666/ (subscriber-only content)
> >
> > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3932351/Po
> > stgreSQL-91-Gets-Synchronous.htm
>
> I have to wonder why these mention PGXN given that at the moment it's
> just a download site, providing similar functionality to software
> catalog on www.postgresql.org.
>
> When there is a command line client available, then sure, it should be
> promoted, but until then it's a WIP (I would say vapourware, but I
> that seems unfair, as I know David certainly is working on it).
Well the same could be said about SQL/MED and SE-postgres, both new items at the
just getting started stage:)
> We
> shouldn't be promoting features for which the primary feature isn't
> yet written in our major version release announcements imnsho.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com
