Re: Is LISTEN/NOTIFY reliable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Is LISTEN/NOTIFY reliable?
Date
Msg-id 20101017.102523.1151864885595931898.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is LISTEN/NOTIFY reliable?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Does anybody know PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY is more reliable than
>> previous versions? ,A (BI vaguely recall that in the previous
>> implementation, message sent by NOTIFY may not be reached to listner.
>> Does PostgreSQL 9.0's new implementation guarantee that the message is
>> received by the listener?
> 
> I think it was always intended to be reliable (otherwise it's not much
> good).  I think I remember a bug where notifications were being lost
> on Windows under heavy load, but I thought we fixed that...

Thanks. Maybe I was confused by the bug.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: knngist - 0.8