Re: "serializable" in comments and names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: "serializable" in comments and names
Date
Msg-id 201009081651.o88GpBg21043@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "serializable" in comments and names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of vie sep 03 19:06:17 -0400 2010:
> >>> How about IsolationUsesXactSnapshot
> 
> > I find this name confusing :-(  Doesn't a READ COMMITTED transaction use
> > transaction snapshots as well?
> 
> AFAIR it doesn't keep the first snapshot around.  If it did, most of
> your work on snapshot list trimming would have been useless, no?

Technically, serializable uses a single transaction snapshot and read
committed uses statement snapshots.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: "serializable" in comments and names
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "serializable" in comments and names