Re: "serializable" in comments and names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: "serializable" in comments and names
Date
Msg-id 4772.1283962351@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "serializable" in comments and names  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: "serializable" in comments and names  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: "serializable" in comments and names  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of vie sep 03 19:06:17 -0400 2010:
>>> How about IsolationUsesXactSnapshot

> I find this name confusing :-(  Doesn't a READ COMMITTED transaction use
> transaction snapshots as well?

AFAIR it doesn't keep the first snapshot around.  If it did, most of
your work on snapshot list trimming would have been useless, no?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...