Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct
Date
Msg-id 201005090223.o492NhB02456@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > (wal_keep_segments can be changed without restarting, right?)
> > > 
> > > Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"?
> > 
> > Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like
> > its been through Google translate.
> 
> LOL, good one.
> 
> I assume it was done so it would start with 'wal', but I see
> 'max_wal_senders', which doesn't start with 'wal' and would match your
> suggestion exactly.  I think we should either rename 'wal_keep_segments'
> or 'max_wal_senders'.

Uh, did we decide that 'wal_keep_segments' was the best name for this
GUC setting?  I know we shipped beta1 using that name.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] psql weird behaviour with charset encodings
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct