Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > (wal_keep_segments can be changed without restarting, right?)
> >
> > Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"?
>
> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like
> its been through Google translate.
LOL, good one.
I assume it was done so it would start with 'wal', but I see
'max_wal_senders', which doesn't start with 'wal' and would match your
suggestion exactly. I think we should either rename 'wal_keep_segments'
or 'max_wal_senders'.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com