Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On mån, 2010-01-04 at 13:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Yea, I am not excited about having vacuumdb do only analyze, but it
> >> seems the most minimal solution. I spelled it --only-analyze and just
> >> posted the reason and patch.
>
> > I can't find the patch and the reason, but note that we already have
> > other options like --data-only, --schema-only, --tuples-only. I
> > personally don't like the spelling of --only-analyze.
>
> In particular note that pg_dump has options --schema and --schema-only,
> and nobody has complained about that. I concur with Peter that this
> spelling is gratuitously unlike everyplace else.
Oh, interesting about pg_dump. Let's just go with --analyze-only.
--only-analyze is feeling odd to me too.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
