Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On mån, 2010-01-04 at 13:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Yea, I am not excited about having vacuumdb do only analyze, but it
>> seems the most minimal solution. I spelled it --only-analyze and just
>> posted the reason and patch.
> I can't find the patch and the reason, but note that we already have
> other options like --data-only, --schema-only, --tuples-only. I
> personally don't like the spelling of --only-analyze.
In particular note that pg_dump has options --schema and --schema-only,
and nobody has complained about that. I concur with Peter that this
spelling is gratuitously unlike everyplace else.
Perhaps we could compromise by calling it "--no-vacuum", instead?
regards, tom lane
