Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... For the moment I've worked
> >> around this by putting the typedef into nodes/params.h itself, but I
> >> can't say I find that a pleasing solution. Has anyone got a better
> >> idea? Should we make a parser/something header that just provides that
> >> typedef?
>
> > Hmm ... if you create the new include file, is that going to avoid
> > having to include params.h in plancache.h?
>
> Well, it'd include the new file instead of params.h.
It would be a problem if params.h included some other stuff, but since
it's standalone I can't say it's a problem.
> > If not, I don't think there's much point in having a new file (other
> > than the typedef just not fitting in params.h).
>
> Yeah, what's bothering me is that it just doesn't fit there --- doesn't
> seem to satisfy the POLA. But I guess there are plenty of bigger
> issues than that in our code base.
Yeah.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
