Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter pointed out upthread that the SQL standard already calls out some
> things that should be available in this way --- has anyone studied that
> yet?
Yeah, I gave it a look. It looks useful as a guide, though obviously
not directly implementable because it relies on GET DIAGNOSTICS to have
somewhere to store the diagnostics information into (a host variable,
etc). They do define that there is a TABLE_NAME, etc. Not much else to
report at the moment.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
