Is this a TODO item?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adriano Lange wrote:
> Hi
>
> Tobias Zahn escreveu:
> > Hello Adriano,
> > thank you very much for posting your patch. I think it will help to make
> > further work easier, too. I hope you don't mind when I ask you some
> > questions.
> >
> > When you said that this new approach is worse or equal than GEQO, did
> > you refer to performance or to the quality of results?
>
> Not exactly this approach, but the implemented (and not configured)
> algorithm was worse than GEQO in a little test made. I just used a
> sequence of 8 executions of a query with 18 relations for each
> algorithm. The costs generated by GEQO was little better than 2PO, in
> average and standard deviation. But 8 executions and 1 query don't prove
> anything. I want to make some further tests, but this little difference
> seems good for me.
>
> > Why do you think that compressed annealing might be the better approach?
>
> I don't think if compressed annealing is better or not. I don't read
> about it yet.
>
> However, an optimizer can be better in a context but worse in another.
>
> Regards,
> Adriano
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
