Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date
Msg-id 20090417211030.GG10700@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:42:31PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> 
> > Is this any better?
> 
> So what happens if I do \dfaQ?  It should throw an error, yes?

Interesting question.
> 
> This help line:
> 
> > +    fprintf(output, _("  \\df[S+] [PATTERN]      list functions.  Add a, n, t, w for aggregate, normal, trigger,
window\n"));
> 
> needs shortening to below 80 chars (or maybe split it in two lines.
> Just make sure they are a single translation item).
> 
> It also seems like we're missing tab completion support for this.

This is another interesting question.  I notice that the tab
completion doesn't support things like \dit.

Should I add that as a separate patch?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings