Re: TODO item - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: TODO item
Date
Msg-id 200903281418.n2SEIdn04481@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TODO item  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: TODO item  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Jaime" == Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
> 
>  Jaime> In the TODO list there is an item "[D] Completed itemAdd
>  Jaime> array_agg() and UNNEST functions for arrays " marked as done
>  Jaime> but 5 items below there is: "Add SQL-standard array_agg() and
>  Jaime> unnest() array functions " it's the same item so this one
>  Jaime> should be removed... or there is a difference between the
>  Jaime> array_agg() and unnest() implemented versus SQL-standard
>  Jaime> array_agg() and unnest()?
> 
> The array_agg() does, I believe, match the standard one, at least
> my reading of the spec doesn't reveal any obvious issues there.
> 
> The unnest() implementation is largely unrelated to the standard one,
> which is impossible to provide without LATERAL.

I removed the duplicate item;  we can add more details about what
additional functionality we need once we get user feedback.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tao Ma"
Date:
Subject: question about deparsing const node and its typmod
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?