Re: binary array and record recv - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: binary array and record recv
Date
Msg-id 200901271407.27657.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: binary array and record recv  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: binary array and record recv  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: binary array and record recv  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 18:30:22 Tom Lane wrote:
> Arguably, pg_dump from an older version should make sure that the auto
> rules should NOT get created, else it is failing to preserve an older
> view's behavior.

We extend properties of objects all the time.  That is why we make new 
releases.  No one is required to use the new properties.

Should pg_dump also make sure that tables imported from an older version are 
not usable for recursive unions or window functions, thus preserving the 
older table's behavior?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Space reservation v02
Next
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning