Re: binary array and record recv - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: binary array and record recv
Date
Msg-id 200901271451.54440.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: binary array and record recv  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 14:07:26 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007 18:30:22 Tom Lane wrote:
> > Arguably, pg_dump from an older version should make sure that the auto
> > rules should NOT get created, else it is failing to preserve an older
> > view's behavior.
>
> We extend properties of objects all the time.  That is why we make new
> releases.  No one is required to use the new properties.
>
> Should pg_dump also make sure that tables imported from an older version
> are not usable for recursive unions or window functions, thus preserving
> the older table's behavior?

This curiously came through with a wrong subject.  The point had already been 
made, though.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Timo Savola
Date:
Subject: log_duration_sample config option patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning