Re: \df displaying volatility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: \df displaying volatility
Date
Msg-id 20080525140510.GF24891@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: \df displaying volatility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: \df displaying volatility  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: \df displaying volatility  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility?  Maybe
> > limit it to \df+?
> 
> Huh?  \df+ has displayed volatility for a long time, and I don't recall
> any great demand to move it into \df.

Hmm, right.  Maybe the problem I have is that we made \df+ so wide so as
to be almost useless by now ...

I think this is mostly caused by the "args" column getting too wide.
Can we remove the OUT params from it?

BTW what happened to the idea of displaying only user functions by
default?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ...
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: \df displaying volatility