Re: WIP: psql default banner patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: WIP: psql default banner patch
Date
Msg-id 20080422162820.4a96987c@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: psql default banner patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WIP: psql default banner patch  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: WIP: psql default banner patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: WIP: psql default banner patch  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
Re: WIP: psql default banner patch  ("Zeugswetter Andreas OSB SD" <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:13:54 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> >  * If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but
> > ask for help if you need it.
> 
> That was NOT part of the agreement.  The version line should stay.

Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
fighting about it but it seems just a waste of bytes. It makes sense if
the version doesn't match.

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: psql default banner patch
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: psql default banner patch