Re: WIP: psql default banner patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brendan Jurd
Subject Re: WIP: psql default banner patch
Date
Msg-id 37ed240d0804221707q3f043c55x7565d637281a7b5f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: psql default banner patch  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: psql default banner patch  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Joshua D. Drake  wrote:
>  Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
>  fighting about it but it seems just a waste of bytes. It makes sense if
>  the version doesn't match.
>

To take a field example, I have one site where I run an 8.2 production
cluster, an 8.3 application testing cluster and my a personal 8.4devel
cluster for hacking postgres.

In such an environment, it's *very* useful to have instant feedback on
which server I've just connected to with psql.

Cheers,
BJ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iD8DBQFIDn3R5YBsbHkuyV0RAjQKAKCLlD3OIdk53D9gI8Kr0BI75WsRSwCfRQLB
30F55MfJN0W6Lzo8mba/yvg=
=fQzl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: psql default banner patch
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: psql default banner patch